Tag Archives: politics

Part of the Celebration

The library is a regular outing for my eight-year-old and I. Yesterday, while I glanced at titles, slipped off my shoes after a long day on my feet, and stood while skimming inside front jackets and back covers for summaries and reviews, my son followed me around the tables and shelves patiently exploring titles and asking questions.

As usual, I picked a bit of nonfiction, a heavy work on the complexities of our prison and judicial systems by Michelle Alexander, coupled with a douse of culture and feminism in a collection of essays by Patricia Hill Collins, the thick paperback conspicuous among the featured titles on the Women’s History Month table.

Books

“Is there a Man’s History Month mom?” my son asked. But before I could answer, he proceeded to explain that he remembered in school he learned [a long time ago] women weren’t treated equal, and that’s why this month was important. I commended him on his youthful insight, and went further to explain to him that even today, women aren’t always treated equal, but Women’s History Month is not only a reminder of balance and equality, but also a celebration of women in general. “Are you a part of that celebration?” he asked.

What women to do you celebrate today, everyday?

From Selma to Montgomery, 1965

Yesterday I watched as civil rights leaders and supporters gathered to remember “Bloody Sunday”, a day when thousands marched in peace for social equality and met a storm of hatred and injustice. Today I contemplate those movements, honor those actions and how they have impacted the continued dialogue on social justice in our country today.

We have come over a way
That with tears hath been watered.
We have come treading our paths
Through the blood of the slaughtered.
Out of the gloomy past,
Till now we stand at last
Where the white gleam
Of our bright star is cast.

—James Weldon Johnson

Alabama: nps.gov

nps.gov

March 4, 2013… “Forty-eight years ago…some of us and some of you here gave a little blood on this bridge.”—Rep. John Lewis speaking on the Civil Rights March of 1965, from Selma to Montgomery, AL.

On Education: Imagine this

I imagine a learning space that resists right angles, creatively contemplates boundaries. I hope for more than one teacher in the classroom. I envision a sea of diverse students learning while engaged at various times in that learning with all five senses, with many different materials and strategies, at desks, tables, on floors, standing up, and outside in the world. I want more than a letter grade and random data from a test to account for how my children are doing in school. I want insight, specifics on what they are learning, how they are developing socially and emotionally, and how we can support what happens in school at home. I want an ongoing stream of communication into how my children are acquiring knowledge and skills, what they are doing in their learning spaces to apply that knowledge, and guidance and opportunities on how to support my children’s learning experiences beyond the classroom. I want to have an open exchange with the school my kids attend, a range of exchange and communication, from face to face, to in the hallways, classrooms, and online, where I always feel I have a sense, a grasp of of my children’s learning community, their growth and develop, their educational environment.

I have expectations and commitments I want upheld not only by the school, but also by our family in partnership with that school. I want a school that sees our family as a whole and as partners in our children’s growth, development, and education. I want a school that puts my children first, even if that means I need to learn to let go, allow my children to grow towards independence and freedom. I want an education for my children, for every child, that seeks equity, justice, and peace.

And while I understand surely no school is perfect, no education theory or philosophy is all knowing or right for every learner, when I see my children excited, eager to learn, and the teachers that care for them just as eager, that is reassuring. When my children say, “mom we love school,” I am thankful.

February 24-March 2 is Montessori Education Week

The First Duty of an Educator

“This then is the first duty of an educator, to stir up life but leave it free to develop”—Maria Montessori

Chalkboard

photo via morguefile

Maria Montessori’s quote seems to ask what is Education if not to conjure up curiosity, then leave a learner be to inquire, explore, find, define, and repeat or not. Shouldn’t the classroom represent a learning space that courts the vastness of life? And even as walls of access may exist on varying levels, shouldn’t education represent a ladder, a channel, a bulldozer, a path towards opening up that access, breaking down those barriers? There is a wide open space young learners will soon occupy. What tools, abilities, sensibilities, character are learners taking with them into that muddy terrain?

Where Did We Ever…

This week is Montessori Education Week, and to my regular followers, you know I write quite a bit about how Montessori education philosophy impacts my family. Some of you have asked, so this week I hope to write and share a bit more about Montessori, but more importantly, as Montessori is not the cure, I want to explore writings, images, quotes on education broadly. From pre-K through college, Education is in crisis in the U.S. Schools are influx and resources are nonexistent. One of the most imperative, demanding, and complex questions this country will explore in the 21st century is how to educate our children.

February 24-March 2 is Montessori Education Week

(On) Education: “High Stakes” Activism

Nearly an entire school rejected the idea of administering yet another flawed standardized test. Imagine the hollowed halls, the pressure ringing in the risk. One by one, each teacher at Garfield High School, in Seattle, Washington, decided to stand for what they believe—that each of their students deserve a chance to learn, acquire sustained knowledge in the material learned, choices in how that material is learned, and fair and varied assessment. Those teachers decided enough with taking precious, limited classroom time simply readying students for a standardized assessment that only speaks to a sliver of material that may or may not be included in the curriculum. Those teachers decided they would rather teach.

This excites me about the change possible in Education. Imagine this movement; where educators decided to take a stance, begin a conversation about how and what we assess in Education, and not accept anything less than a path towards what is just. Education must have this difficult conversation; then Education must do something for every single student.

chalkboard

The system, flawed policies, are not new. What is new, are collective movements by educators calling for change. Imagine the rippling, as more educators begin critically thinking and speaking out loud about teaching and learning. And while one set of test questions might shed light on glimpses of termed knowledge, Education needs showers of identifiable and transparent learning for every student.

Teachers have been bound to their classrooms for years grappling with the effects of “high-stakes testing” and failed Education policies. Many of those teachers, especially in lower resourced schools, are often alone in their work, and the expectations and consequences are absolute. Those teachers standing up for change are not running away from the responsibility to engage students in learning, rather, their voices and activism raised the stakes of standardized testing for the system to now grapple with out loud. This collective conversation is calling for change, this stance by educators—a brave beginning.

________________________________________________________________

Every Note of Fire Sounds like…

Listen yet again…to the rapid heartbeats, to the panic, to the loss of life. Be it in a small town, a rural narrative or an inner city, an urban narrative. Every shot of fire initiates violence, contemplates one similar singular narrative—death. Listen to another news story, countless captioned words running across the screen. Even with the sound turned down, the miles in between, the tears are already etched in our ears. We know what pain sounds like: an aching louder than any bit of news report unfolding.

This most recent innocent loss of life to gun violence asks: are we now empty, desensitized, distant, cold, dismissive? Is this just one more incident of violence? Or are we paused, speechless, tearful, empathetic—reflective? Just months, weeks, hours ago I wept as the shaking voices of victims told us of death sketched at the end of a barrel in Chardon, Ohio, in Sanford and Jacksonville, Florida, in Chicago, Illinois, in Aurora, Colorado, in Oak Creek, Wisconsin, in Clackamas, Oregon. I wept as I read statistics about gun violence in the United States. I pause now at the news of Newtown, Connecticut. Pause while I wipe my tears, hug my young children, my tissue still moist from news of violence mourned a few nights ago, a few days ago, a few hours ago. This gun violence seems an ongoing blur, yet each life impacted from that violence matters.

While children all over this country rest their heads among the twinkling lights of candles, of pine, of bulbs hanging just out of reach, there seems this accompanying notion that our children are also just out of our reach. A father reflecting after the Newtown tragedy, seemed to say this, as he tried to describe what it was like walking toward this unforgiving narrative playing over and over again before us, between us, among us.

I imagine children; our little ones as they walk out the door, as we walk away from them, leave them among their peers, their tiny waving hands; their hugs around our knees, around our necks. No parent can ever imagine, should ever have to imagine parting at the foot of the classroom, in the doorway at home, in the parking lot at school, might mean goodbye forever.

This kind of violence is unacceptable on every human level, not fathomable, not the price any child, any innocent human being should pay for these curling metal flaws we call instruments, tools, we feel compelled to keep carelessly in our lives. Guns are, were created for one purpose—to end life—to silence. No matter how much we stir, color this narrative, dance around these news stories of violence; attempt not to look or to listen, every note of fire contemplates the end of life. Every note of fire sounds like death.

I encourage us to sound, look, act more like love.

A Soldier’s Song

 

Somewhere in the bended wrinkle of your boots, beside the tangled laces, the notes of your service, your experiences lie stitched in cloth and suede. In the bottom grooves of those boots, memories of the desert, the water, the hills and fields crowd in dark corners between heel and sole. Our little boys have all tried on your camel step, their small bare feet searching for the rhythm of their father, your narrative of love, courage, and hopefulness, your call of duty. I’ve watched you march in circles; sing your soldier’s song in call and response with our smiling children trying to keep cadence. I thank you for sharing your stories, your travels, your language, your life with us. As you serve, we serve with you, and we love you. Thank you Major Edwards for your service and duty sealed with your life in honor and commitment to the best for all of our lives.

Today, on Veteran’s Day, I thank you husband, father, brother, son…sing along with you today (and everyday) your solder’s song.

LifeandWrite.com Weekend Remix

…Funnel Love

http://wp.me/pNODY-1mW

Text in the City…

http://wp.me/pNODY-1mK

Confetti Word Frenzy

http://wp.me/pNODY-1hC

Vote by Ballot, by Crayon, by Pen

http://wp.me/pNODY-1mD

…One Vote between Us

http://wp.me/pNODY-1mg

Vote by Ballot, by Crayon, by Pen

His vote may not move the electorate, but his voice is part of a future generation engaged.

A few hugs, two stickers, one vote between us

There are so few times that I can grab the hand of my seven-year-old and hold on. He is getting older, wiser, and more independent. He is engaged in the world in ways that encourages him to peel away from me, stand on his own, challenge me gently with his blooming ideas.

I can however, often count on the vulnerable space between his long arms around my waist after a long day, around my shoulders, around my heart. I hope hugs will always be allowed between mothers and sons.

And no matter how old he gets, I hope we can continue to share in those precious, important moments, to hang out. This morning was exactly that kind of opportunity. I wanted to take him with me to vote. So as my oldest crawled out of bed and found his way through the earliest parts of his day, I invited him to join me. He smiled widely, then reminded me, “Mom, I’m not 18, I can’t vote.” I smiled, then said, “that’s o.k., you can help me.” He agreed.

So this morning, as I stood in line to cast my ballot, instead of offering my dangling arm for my son to cross, slide his fingers in the cusp of my grip, follow me towards the future—I found myself looking for the pale of his open hand, the sort of his swinging arm, the uncertainty of his stride, his head held high. We were there to vote, and engage with all that comes along with that responsibility. I walked him through the process step by step. And as we stood there waiting, I searched for thoughts of my son’s future, his rambling dreams, what I wish for him, what he doesn’t yet know to wish for himself.

Today when I voted, I was reminded that I spoke not only for myself but for my sons, with my sons, with the sons and daughters I’ve never met, the ones I’ll never meet, the narrative of their lives unfolding and uncertain.

Then finally inside the open wings of that voting machine, my son and I stood together, as we read each of the choices, and I carefully pressed my finger against the touch screen. We listened to the tapping ticker of the ballot box, watched the stitched mark across the curling tally, held hands without saying a word–voted.

A perfectly perfect autumn day in Ohio

 

A reflection on “otherness” in the public and private space

I felt compelled to share this experience I’ve been holding on to for the past 18 months. I haven’t talked much about it since it happened, but in this emotional moment in our nation, where so many of us are reminded of our history and tensions, I realized sharing it might add to the complexity of these conversations many of us are having in our private spaces. The following incident reminded me of how complicated my skin color really is in our cultural public space. And as much as we’d like to think we live in post-racial times, my own personal and continual experiences have shown me otherwise.

I don’t know how we “fix” bias and profiling, or “fix” acting violently, skeptically, prejudicially on race, ethnicity, origin, sexual orientation/preference, or perception. But I do know how sharing our narratives is important, how talking about these issues is necessary, how using our vote and our voice is imperative, and that strategic (but nonviolent) action is critical to change.

I’d like to imagine, fantasize, or even make excuses that the following incident was isolated. But I’ve been living in my skin for 37 years and unfortunately my experiences know better. In sharing this story, all that I ask is that we think about how we look at each other, think about there must be more to a person than just our outward or initial perception, think before we speak, before we act carelessly.

Finally, the lasting thing I do remember about the other person in this story was that he was a father. We are both parents. And that common bond, that respect I had for him as another parent was more thought and consideration than he ever gave me.

October 2010—On a beautiful cool autumn day I left work conscious of a recent robbery in the area, conscious of a potential suspect on the loose, and in a hurry to pick up my two young boys from school. I left work approximately around 5:07pm. Walking towards the parking garage I passed a security officer watching the area, and as I approached the garage, I passed several police cars and a barricade. Watching over my shoulders I entered the parking garage and passed yet another police officer. My assumption was they were there to keep us safe. I thought nothing odd about them doing their job. As a matter of fact, I felt comfort in their presence (there was of course a robbery suspect on the loose).

I passed security and several officers in uniform with guns in their holsters, and no one stopped or approached me. I walked four flights of stairs up to the 5th level and got into my vehicle, a four-door BMW SUV. I drove down the first ramp to exit and immediately saw a young man with dark sunglasses turn around and approach me with a large shotgun rifle. My heart was beating, my hands were moist; I subtlety looked around for an escape. There was no one else around, and at this point I had to make some quick decisions, as I had no description of the robbery suspect and no idea the intentions of this man with the rifle. I tried not to panic. I was scared because I had no idea who this guy was, but my mind was fixed on getting out of this situation while my eyes were fixated on the large rifle he had strapped across his chest, resting parallel to his waist. At the time, the gun wasn’t pointed directly at me but it also wasn’t pointed down at the ground. It was a terrifying moment.

As the young man approached, I realized (or was forced to assume) he was a police officer (though he never identified himself as such), and I immediately removed my sunglasses and asked him kindly not to point his weapon at me. I told him it was scary (and I still had no confirmation he was an actual law enforcement officer). He replied sarcastically, “I’m not pointing my gun at you.” I reiterated that the gun scared me and again asked him to consider my position. At this point, he still hadn’t identified himself as an officer. The burden was on me to assume as much. He proceeded to detain me and ask me several questions. He asked to see the shirt I was wearing. He asked me what color it was. I answered the questions but also told him I needed to get my children and that I did nothing wrong. I asked him why he was asking me all of these questions. Ignoring me, he asked my name, he asked where I worked, he asked what my job entailed, and he asked me what I did that day. I told him that I was working that day; that I worked for the university, that I’m an educator, and that I work with children. I reiterated that I was a mother of two children—then he cut me off responding, “so what, I have children too.” I told him I was educated and again reiterated that I was an employee of the university. He responded, “Some of the best criminals are educated.” I told him I wasn’t a criminal and hadn’t done anything wrong.

I felt as though I was pleading with this man to see me for more than just a profile. I wanted this man to see me as a human being. I asked him what he wanted from me and expressed repeatedly that I did nothing wrong. He refused to give me more information on why he was detaining me. He asked for my ID. He asked me my date of birth. By this time, several minutes had elapsed and I told him that I needed to pick up my children. He said that I wasn’t going anywhere and that I fit the description of the robbery suspect. He said, “She was black, had sunglasses, and had on a curly wig.” He said that I fit that description. But after seeing a picture of the suspect later on the news, the only similarity I had with the image and description of that person was that my skin was black. There were no other descriptive qualities that were even remotely similar.

Though the officer kept his sunglasses on, at the beginning of this interaction, as to be totally transparent, I had removed my sunglasses immediately. This simple act of removing my sunglasses was a part of the unspoken rules, “the code”, understood by many people of color, especially males when encountering the police. As a person of color there is this unspoken rule that even if you’re innocent, have done nothing wrong, ensuring your personal safety lies in making sure that a police officer you encounter feels comfortable with your otherness. Often the burden of making police officers or others in authority feel comfortable with your otherness is on that person of color standing there, your word against that officer’s word, your life potentially lying in the balance. And me, as a person of color, black, that unspoken rule filters into many more parts of my life, where the expectation is I assume the role of making others feel comfortable with my otherness, culture, language, hair, etc. This is an act performed daily by thousands of people of color in the public space. It is conscious and exhausting.

I remember telling the officer repeatedly that I worked for the university and that I hadn’t done anything wrong. I told him I was scared in this moment as he held his gun before me, as we were face to face in an isolated part of the garage. In the back of my mind, I kept thinking about making it out of this situation alive. The officer continued to detain me in this isolated space and verbally harass me, smearing me with questions, jabs of sarcasm, and reminders of his ability to detain me in that isolated space just because he could, and there was the obvious reminder that he had a weapon. I asked him if he wanted to search my car. I asked him if he wanted to search my person. I reminded him I was a mother of young children. He didn’t want me to speak up for myself as he verbally harassed me with cruel comments about how I fit the description of the robbery suspect and that he didn’t know that I wasn’t the actual suspect. I told him I understood that, but unless he had more than just the color of my skin, he had no right to detain me. I reminded him, I had done nothing wrong. I was just coming from work.

But my pleas were ignored. He called in a description of my vehicle (though the suspect got away on foot) and continued to hold me there. The time seemed so slow, minute by minute, all I could think about were my children and them wondering where I was. I pleaded with the officer that I needed to go get my children and I was adamant that I did nothing wrong. He said, typically when someone is talking this much they are trying to distract his attention—implying that I was hiding something. I told him I had nothing to hide and reminded him that he could search my vehicle if he wanted to. He told me not to get out of the vehicle. I told him he was scaring me and I didn’t know what was going on. He replied, “put yourself in my shoes.” I replied to him, “Put yourself in my shoes; you have a gun.”

I told him I understood that he needed to do his job but I expressed to him that he did not have to harass me, or talk to me in a disrespectful way. I asked him if I could call my husband because I needed to get my children. After at least 20 long minutes, he finally “allowed” me to call. I asked him for his name and badge number and shortly after, he said I was free to go.

It was over, but the memories of that day have left scars that remind me I am always walking in my otherness in the public space, especially when encountering law enforcement. And being a married professional woman in her thirties with young children, driving a luxury car, carrying a designer handbag, hair and make-up in place, impeccably dressed, and an articulate tongue did not exempt me from racial profiling, and did not strengthen the perception of my integrity that day.

So as I try to raise my boys in this most recent reminder of present day racial tensions, especially with some law enforcement and others that may only look first at their skin color, I am carefully crafting what to tell my boys as I raise them to be safe in their own skin. If their mother can be racially profiled covered in culture’s status adornments and degrees, and that still didn’t make a difference in perception, these boys as brown males have a heavy burden to bear that as a mother, with tears, prayers, and only the best of intentions, wishes I could carry for them.

I understand our human interactions are complex and it is not always about race. But my experiences have shown me, race or not, it is very much about perception, and I’d like us to look at each other differently, as humans, as complex beings. In this time of fear and skepticism, color and tension; accepting, respecting someone’s humanity seems the very least we can do (for now).

As a footnote, with the support of my employer, I was able to speak face to face with the Chief of Police. He did take this incident seriously and visited me in person at work to listen to my side of the story, and to formally apologize. He was not defensive, and did share with me his plans for corrective action of this officer. My hope is that we work to prevent incidents like this and other such encounters before they lead to careless mistakes and leave permanent scars.

Headlines, dark suits, and letterpress

I am weary of what’s behind bold headlines that press their cold limp rhetoric between women’s legs, inside women’s minds. There are no dark secrets we women keep (well maybe there are a few). Life lives in and through our creviced charm, and there are no words, legislation, or debate that can change the brilliant mystery ringing in our wombs. Yes, we can cultivate life inside of our bodies if we choose, but if we don’t, we can choose with or without social orders and legislation. The colors of those choices are ours to paint; the pain and vivid maroon are ours to bear. Oh voices behind the headlines, I wish we could let you borrow our paint palette for just one month, you would see the lines are not black and white.

As women, we can utter ourselves timing, patience, practice, or reservation. Oh politics, don’t you think those that can carry life (whether they do or not) in their bellies have sense enough to color inside or outside their own lines, speak for themselves, do what is best for their health in love and in logic?

I wonder about those dark suits and even darker tendencies inside smoke-filled offices worried about writing women’s narratives, their destinies, their choices, their health. Creating life is a mystery isn’t it? As women, we too are in reverence of the ability, the responsibility—which is why we can and should choose throughout our lives our own narratives without legislation, pen, or debate. If there are concerns for women’s natural abilities to create faces, love, and languages, or better yet, discussion and action on women’s health, I would then ask you voices beyond the magnificent headlines, what are your quotes, dark suits, and letterpress to contribute to that discussion, action, and creation—love, resources, time, or just chatter?

This gray day in our pockets (revised)

In the morning this gray day in our pockets will break the backs of someone already bending over and under for a piece of comfort in the lush of our great nation. Someone’s struggling tongue can’t translate their pain in a call for balance, their woes swallowed up in headlines, loud demagogues bickering.

And just across the street, two steps from a box on the corner, someone somewhere is busy balancing bills, juggling workloads, living from paycheck to paycheck or living with no paycheck. While words and politics swim in dizzying rhetoric, someone somewhere steps over suffering with dirt on their feet. Someone’s sunken shoulders will rise in the morning and again scrape loose change together for a loaf of bread and some hope. Last night, someone sighed of relief that the heat blowing in through the window was warmer than the water to bathe in. Today someone will sit with the pile of bills, worry as the checks dry up like breast milk did six months ago. Hungry mouths don’t feed simply on legislative drama; they are hungry for food, shelter, survival, and security. When hunger speaks by vote, by stance, by violence, I hope someone is listening. I hope someone is listening.

Breakfast in bed with headlines and rhetoric

On some weekends my family is busy at the sight of dawn, rushing from place to place, errands, appointments, and family activities. But some weekends we rest, my husband and I try to “sleep late” (remember we have kids), whisper to each other, hoping if we don’t get up too soon the kids will sleep, stay in their beds for just a little while longer so we can stay in the closeness for just a little while longer, read, watch, and discuss the news of the day, the change unfolding around us.

It might not seem that sweet, that romantic for a couple to lie in bed, reflecting on rhetorical rants, perspectives on politics, world view, socio-economics, sports, and entertainment; but it is this lovely ritual we have that I believe keeps us close to what each other is thinking, what each other believes in. Sure it’s not holding hands (though our mornings are not without affection), but it is holding each other’s thoughts, perspectives, and dreams for ourselves, for our children, for the world we live in. It is our way to stay close to each other and close to the change in the world.

My two-year-old is surprisingly patient when he knows we our reading or watching the “news” (it’s cute he knows to call it that), we are stirring inside, caught up in the debate, sometimes with each other, sometimes with the commentators who don’t hear us and who (if they did) probably wouldn’t care. But we are engaged anyway–engaged with each other, engaged with the happenings of the world. We live in an age where we could go online and join an anonymous conversation in social networks, but I admit, at times, social networking can’t compare to the comedy, furry, and passionate speak we keep just between us. Lying next to each other sharing breakfast, the papers, television, good morning and hugs from our sons, seems much sweeter, more simple, comfortable, more personal than just sitting in front of a computer screen or a smartphone (though to be honest they are nearby charged and ready).

Yes, it is this Saturday or Sunday ritual that keep us stitched up in each other’s thoughts about what is happening to our days and how we are living those days informed, sometimes frustrated about the happenings of the world around us, sometimes in perfect peace with ourselves. We talk about our vote, our voice or contribution to the community and the country we live in. As we watch, muse over the passing of the boiling world around us, listen to how we live in and out of its tangled narrative, I remember we have our own narrative to contribute to justice, to humanity. We have our own children to raise to be wise, respectful, careful, courageous citizens. We are reminded that we do not live in this world alone and the distance between us does get smaller and smaller each passing day. We are reminded why we decided to have children in the first place, and reflect on how they have changed us and how we hope to raise them to change the world in some meaningful way. We worry just a bit (I sometimes worry a lot), about each other, about our children, about humanity. Then we sit back and listen, learn, debate, lament, or celebrate the time we have together, in this space, with these words, as we learn a little bit more about each other one headline, one topic, one televised segment at a time.

Somewhere struggle sounds like…

…the stealth vibration of rhythm balanced with the savory cry of angst, a conversation between steady thumping drum, wildly agile horn, and thoughtful pulsing bass. I clicked on my email the other morning and learned friend and fellow artist, Mark Lomax, along with Eddie Bayard, and Dean Hullett were included in a conversation on salon.com about the soundtrack to our neo movements, struggles, and calls for change and action in our sociopolitical realm. The premise of this article was to highlight jazz, but it also drew me to consider how the underground lyrics of hip hop and neo-soul were also not strangers, if not a preface to what we know as movements that include “Occupy”. These sounds have done more than accompany these movements. I would entertain that some of these sounds have led movements, charged voices with sounds that are of no one language, but of many.

I think of Lomax’s album, The State of Black America, and remember listening to its politically astute renditions far ahead of camping in parks and confrontations on foreclosed porches. The “call in response” the media likes to color as neo “Occupy” messaging really is more reminiscent of hip hop between DJ and MC, those roots and inspirations, along with jazz traditions are what Lomax, Bayard, and Hullett have carved into this album. Forward moving jazz is not always “easy” listening—not easy as in the kind of passive arrangement you might hear in an office lobby. Jazz can be complex, complicated, and just as thoughtfully tactical as the daily editorial columns accompanying this country’s most politically charged headlines. I’m glad that salon.com entertained that idea. I like the thought that our new movements might have a soundtrack. I’d like to entertain even further the idea that this neo movement built of vibrancy and variance, transcending myriad demographics is maybe not just accompanied but rather first penned in sound. I understand sometimes the words, the faces, the stoic stances don’t get heard—but it’s hard to ignore a roaring score.

Read more: Could jazz provide the Occupy Wall Street Soundtrack?

This gray day in our pockets

In the morning this gray day in our pockets will break the backs of someone already bending over and under for a piece of comfort in the lush of our great nation. Someone’s struggling tongue can’t translate their pain in a call for balance, their woes swallowed up in headlines, loud demagogues bickering.

Somewhere in between those typeset lines her womb is a story someone else can’t write for her. A belly swelling or a dark echo is a mystery only she can keep. From a distance someone can weep for her decisions or for her survival, but she must sound her own cries pushing and pulling at life. Those tears that sit on her upper lip taste like joy or pain or guilt or freedom.

And just across the street, two steps from a box on the corner, someone somewhere is busy balancing bills, juggling workloads, dropping pay. While words swim in dizzying rhetoric, someone somewhere steps over suffering with dirt on their feet. Someone’s sunken shoulders will rise in the morning and again scrape loose change together for a loaf of bread and some hope. Last night, someone sighed of relief that the heat blowing in through the window was warmer than the water to bathe in. Today someone will sit with the pile of bills, worry as the checks dry up like breast milk did six months ago. Hungry mouths don’t feed on drama; give them the chance to speak.

Self-Portrait

He wants to be

A brutal old man,

An aggressive old man,

As dull, as brutal

As the emptiness around him,

He doesn’t want a compromise,

Nor to be ever nice

To anyone. Just mean,

And final in his brutal,

His total, rejection of it all…

Read the full poem here: Self-Portrait by Robert Creeley : The Poetry Foundation [poem].

Arts Advocacy Day 2011

In front of House Speaker Boehner’s door (as congress people whisked in and out) right before our meeting with his office and staff (it’s a tense time on Capitol Hill). We walked in his office and found many dark suits in many intense conversations.

His staff took us back to a dark office space, it smelled of smoke. On the table in the corner one lamp and a single picture, the gray rainy day bled through the window. The first few moments were tense as we braced for each other’s stance, but as we talked, the words warmed up a bit. We had a relatively brief (20-30 minutes), bright, and purposeful conversation about the importance of Speaker Boehner’s national voice to the people of Ohio and the nation. We reinforced his responsibility to think broadly and consider the importance of the arts even in this challenging economic climate. We asked him to consider his position (as head of the education committee) on access to arts in education, creativity, and innovation for every American. Not only is arts central to our culture, it helps build transferable skills only the arts can develop. Our work on the Hill yesterday was to keep arts, creativity, and innovation in the minds of legislators. The arts create options and possibilities; they build communities, create jobs, generate real revenue, promote diplomacy, and leave a lasting cultural legacy.

Rumor has it these guys are running for office in 2012

image

Have you heard of them? They look so familiar…

Smart, sweet, and politically astute

image

Thank you Kerry Washington for all you do in your activism in the arts, education, and for the human condition.

Mason: On having a party, a Democratic party

Admittedly I nerd out on NPR every now and then. I typically listen in the car during my daily commute. My sons are too young to put up a fight so they have to listen…for now. The other morning on the way to school, political news beaming from the speaker, Mason hears something he’s curious about:

“Mom, what is a Democratic party,” he said.

“It has something to do with Barack Obama,” I said.

“Oh.”

“It’s  something called politics honey.” (I knew he didn’t know what I meant. I was struggling trying to explain.)

“Mom.”

“Yes.”

“I want to have a Democratic party. We should have a Democratic party. I can invite all my friends.”

“Hmm.”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 704 other followers

%d bloggers like this: